top of page

Pentagon Scientist Responds to Allegations of UAP Secrecy Following Tense Congressional Hearing

In an intense back-and-forth spurred by this week’s Congressional hearing, the Pentagon's chief scientist overseeing the investigation of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) has vehemently denied accusations of his Office's lack of transparency.

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, who heads the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), defended his team and the agency's operations during the recent Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs hearing. The committee featured two former U.S. Navy pilots and an ex-intelligence officer, all alleging potential cover-ups by the U.S. federal government regarding UAPs.

Kirkpatrick took to LinkedIn, praising Congressional efforts in addressing the UAP phenomena but expressed discontent with the portrayal of AARO during the hearing. “They are truth-seekers, as am I,” he stated, adding that the public would not have gathered this impression from the discussions.

The Debrief, an investigative media platform, has verified the authenticity of Kirkpatrick's statement, noting that it reflects his personal opinions and not the stance of the U.S. Department of Defense or Intelligence Community.

Central to the hearing was the testimony of former intelligence officer David Grusch. Representing the Pentagon's Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) during his tenure at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), Grusch's shocking claims have grabbed headlines. He confirmed reports of the U.S. government's involvement in retrieving and reverse-engineering crafts of “non-human origin.”

Additionally, in a dramatic moment, when probed by Rep. Tim Burchett if individuals had suffered harm in efforts to maintain UAP secrecy, Grusch responded, "Yes. Personally." But, he refrained from expanding on whether such actions had led to fatalities.

Responding to these serious allegations, Kirkpatrick said, "AARO was established, by law, to investigate the allegations and assertions presented in yesterday’s hearing." He highlighted that AARO's team included law enforcement personnel to swiftly address any such claims.

However, the controversy deepened when Grusch claimed to have briefed Kirkpatrick about UAP evidence in April 2022, before Kirkpatrick assumed leadership at AARO. Kirkpatrick, according to Grusch, never revisited the concerns shared during that conversation.

In previous statements, Kirkpatrick had assured the Senate Subcommittee that AARO found no substantial evidence supporting extraterrestrial activities, off-world technology, or objects defying known physics laws. Contradicting this, Grusch stated these claims were "not accurate."

The Debrief, in its endeavor to gain clarity, reached out to Charles McCullough, an attorney believed to be representing Grusch but received no response.

Kirkpatrick’s online statement questioned the intentions of some "Congressional elements", insinuating they might be withholding evidence. The core of his critique was the subcommittee hearing's perceived denigration of AARO. He reaffirmed AARO's authority, resources, and commitment to its mission and urged any knowledgeable individuals to approach the office.

On contacting the Pentagon for a comment, spokesperson Susan Gough clarified that Dr. Kirkpatrick’s post was a personal expression. She emphasized the Department’s commitment to transparency, and lauded AARO’s progress since its inception a year ago.

To conclude, as the UAP debate rages on, it remains vital to ascertain the truth, ensuring that national security concerns are met while maintaining the trust of the American public.

bottom of page